Abstract
When fifteen-year-old Louie posted a TikTok video criticizing his school’s disciplinary policies from his bedroom, he faced a month-long suspension despite having no notice of which policies he had violated. Across the country, Kaitlin shared a Snapchat criticizing her chemistry teacher with friends at a local coffee shop and faced expulsion with minimal opportunity to explain the context. In both cases, students received limited procedural protections before suffering severe academic consequences.
Recommended Citation
Sarah Stich,
Discipline with Due Process: Constitutional Safeguards for Student Speech After Plaintiff A,
91 Mo. L. Rev.
(2026)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol91/iss1/13