Abstract
Based on Professor Bowman’s response article, “Loss” Revisited: A Defense of the Centerpiece of the Federal Economic Crime Sentencing Guideline, I am gratified to find that he and I share much common ground. In fact, I believe our respective positions are closer in many ways than his article suggests. I will use this Response primarily to clarify what I see as the key areas of disagreement about the proper role of loss – and, particularly, intended loss – in the economic crime Guidelines. I will then offer a few brief comments about possible directions for reform
Recommended Citation
Daniel S. Guarnera,
Reply to Professor Bowman’s “Loss” Revisited,
82 Mo. L. Rev.
(2017)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol82/iss1/6