This article suggests the contrary - that if a section 707(b) motion properly raises the question, a bankruptcy judge has a duty to consider the actual financial situation of a debtor who is not subject to a means test presumption; that the judge should find abuse where the debtor can repay a sufficient amount of unsecured debt; and that the means test serves to guide, rather than foreclose, such determinations of abuse. Part I discusses the language of BAPCPA that requires this result, focusing on the nature of the means test as a presumption. Part II examines (and finds wanting) the contrary arguments asserted in the Culhane & White article. Part III explores the extent to which statutory provisions associated with the means test may guide judicial determinations of debt-paying ability.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.