This Note argues that the Eighth Circuit's decision in United States v. Johnson severely limits a defendant's protections against the government's intentional use of implicit, or "wink and nod," agreements with undercover informants to circumvent the right to counsel. Although the court's decision may further the interests of effective law enforcement, the resulting sacrifices of fair play in the adversarial justice system is too costly for society to bear.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.