Brett A. Emison


Missouri demands “the highest degree of care regarding dangerous instrumentalities because of the great risk of injury or death.” However, Missouri also has held that only ordinary care is required when, in a suit against an electric utility, the injury was not caused by the “the inherently dangerous properties of electricity.” This Note examines the struggles faced by a divided court in determining which standard to apply when these holdings conflict.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.