In Tarsney v. O’Keefe, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed a claim for lack of standing brought by Minnesota state taxpayers challenging a state program that provided abortions for indigent women. In so doing, the Eighth Circuit applied the holding of Flast v. Cohen, the United States Supreme Court case that narrowly limited federal taxpayer standing. The Eighth Circuit, however, erred in relying on Flast, as that case applies only to federal taxpayer standing, not state taxpayers. The court should have interpreted and applied the holding of Doremus v. Board of Education of Borough of Hawthorne, the leading Supreme Court case on the issue of state taxpayer standing, to determine whether the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the expenditure.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.