Abstract
This Comment explains why Missouri's limitation doctrine prevented tolling the limitation period of Hill's state-law claim while it remained in federal court under pendent jurisdiction. This is an issue of first impression in the state. The Comment then explores the difficulties that are likely to arise when the new supplemental jurisdiction tolling provision is invoked by plaintiffs in Missouri.
Recommended Citation
Rosel Rodriquez Pine,
Preserving Pendent Claims Subject to Special Limitation Periods in Missouri after the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990,
56 Mo. L. Rev.
(1991)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol56/iss4/6