Home > Law Journals > JDR > Vol. 2026 > Iss. 1 (2026)
Abstract
This article critiques the widespread use of the terms “facilitative” and “evaluative” to describe mediation techniques. Despite their popularity in scholarship and practice, these labels are inconsistently defined, frequently misunderstood, and fundamentally flawed. Drawing on a survey of mediation experts, the article documents significant confusion about how professionals interpret these terms – and how they think that others interpret them. It builds on Leonard Riskin’s critique of the facilitative-evaluative framework, which shows that the language not only oversimplifies complex processes but also risks confusing parties and undermining informed decision-making.
Recommended Citation
John Lande,
How AI Can Help Mediators Say What They Really Mean,
2026 J. Disp. Resol.
(2026)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2026/iss1/7