Home > Law Journals > JDR > Vol. 2025 > Iss. 2 (2026)
Abstract
The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer once wrote, “The first forty years of life give us the text; the next thirty supply the commentary on it.” Forty years after Owen Fiss’s seminal article “Against Settlement,” it is time to reimagine how we approach the settlement debate beyond traditional dichotomies. Just as Schopenhauer recognized that time and experience allow us to better understand our past, forty years of grappling with the settlement debate have given us the perspective to see its limitations, and now with emerging technologies, new possibilities. The ‘text’ of the debate—its dichotomous framing and distributive solutions—has shaped four decades of myopic policy and practice. Now it is time for our ‘commentary’— a more nuanced understanding that moves beyond either/or thinking and toward integrative solutions.
Recommended Citation
Alyson Carrel and Peter K. Chan,
The Settlement Privacy-Transparency Matrix: Moving Beyond the Dichotomous Mindset in the Settlement Debate,
2025 J. Disp. Resol.
(2026)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2025/iss2/7