This article evaluates the connection between judicial education and judges’ needs and preferences. In Part I, we begin by discussing the history, purpose, and form of judicial education, charting its evolution over time. In Part II, we examine current judicial education programs and scholarship, highlighting differences and similarities between federal and state programming. In Part III, we analyze the limitations of existing scholarship and programming, arguing judicial education programs are insufficiently tied to evidence of judicial demands. We conclude in Parts IV and V by suggesting two proposals to align programming with needs: (1) an annual needs-based assessment of judicial education offerings and (2) a voucher system for judges to attend their choice of judicial education programs.
Duane Benton and Jennifer A.L. Sheldon-Sherman,
What Judges Want and Need: User-Friendly Foundations for Effective Judicial Education,
2015 J. Disp. Resol.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2015/iss1/3