In Sands v. Menard, Inc., the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin upheld an arbitration award reinstating a discharged attorney to her position as in-house counsel. On appeal, the court refused to vacate the reinstatement order, notwithstanding the fact that reinstatement was not requested or desired by either party, the effect of reinstatement was likely to violate the ethical rules that bind attorneys, and other remedies were available to compensate the aggrieved party. This note explores the limited but important role that judicial review plays, and will continue to play, in arbitration and how this role affected the outcome of Sands v. Menard.
F. Shabnam Nouraie,
Arbitration Nation: While Arbitration Grows, Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards May Be Shrinking,
2010 J. Disp. Resol.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2010/iss1/11