Home > Law Journals > JDR > Vol. 2006 > Iss. 2 (2006)
Abstract
This article focuses on newly developing Standards designed to regulate the mediation industry with respect to civil disputes. The particular focus is on the mediator's requirements of neutrality and impartiality and whether these requirements are impacted by assurances of a fair result and other fairness concepts such as a balanced process and informed decision making. The basic problem is that mediators are guided by Standards and stand-alone definitions of mediation, yet many Standards contain contradictory or vague provisions. Furthermore, the mediator's actual role may be dictated by her own personal style, values, and commercial needs in conjunction with the parties' particular needs
Recommended Citation
Susan Nauss Exon,
How Can a Mediator Be Both Impartial and Fair: Why Ethical Standards of Conduct Create Chaos for Mediators,
2006 J. Disp. Resol.
(2006)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2006/iss2/2