Home > Law Journals > JDR > Vol. 2001 > Iss. 2 (2001)
Since 1983, this annual Article 2 has been prepared to provide a survey of recent developments in the case law interpreting and applying the various state versions of the Uniform Arbitration Act3. The purpose is to promote uniformity in the interpretation of the U.A.A. by developing and explaining the underlying principles and rationales courts have applied in recent cases.4
Brent A. Correll, S. Jacob Sappington, David Sims, and Blake J. Tompkins,
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act,
2001 J. Disp. Resol.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2001/iss2/10