This Article is an overview of recent court decisions that interpret state versions of the Uniform Arbitration Act ("U.A.A.").' Arbitration statutes patterned after the U.A.A. have been adopted by thirty-four states and the District of Columbia.' The goal of this project is to promote uniformity in the interpretation of the U.A.A. by articulating the underlying policies and rationales of recent court decisions interpreting the U.A.A.
Benjamin K. Byrd, Mondonna L. Ghasedi, Robert J. Steintjes, and Michelle Trant,
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act,
1998 J. Disp. Resol.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol1998/iss2/8