Home > Law Journals > JDR > Vol. 1995 > Iss. 1 (1995)
Abstract
In the American judicial system, no litigant may be denied life, liberty or property without due process of the law. The rights to representation, to have a fair hearing, and to have the opportunity to present evidence on one's own behalf are ingrained in our concept of "justice." When one agrees to submit a conflict to an alternative forum of dispute resolution, are those essential rights lost? This Note examines those questions in the context of a congressional act mandating arbitration as the mode of conflict resolution in the transportation industry
Recommended Citation
Penelope Hopper,
Railroading Essential Rights: The Status of Judicial Review of Alleged Due Process Violations in Arbitration Hearings under the Railway Labor Act - Shafii v. P.L.C. British Airways,
1995 J. Disp. Resol.
(1995)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol1995/iss1/9