This annual Article2 has been prepared since 1983 as a survey of recent developments in the case law interpreting and analyzing various versions of the Uniform Arbitration Act (U.A.A.). 3 Currently, thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have adopted arbitration statutes patterned after the U.A.N 4 The purpose of this analysis is to promote uniformity in interpreting the U.A.A. by explaining the underlying policies and rationales that have developed from recent court decisions.
Dan Coughlin, Laura Kintz, John Moore, and Melissa Morrow,
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act,
1993 J. Disp. Resol.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol1993/iss2/10