Lewis D. Barr


This comment is divided into five parts. Part I examines the nature of the mini-trial-its unique and attractive features. Part II inquires into the minitrial's suitability for resolving certain types of disputes. Part III describes how the mini-trial meets the needs of corporate parties to a dispute while benefiting the public. Part IV addresses the validity of general ADRM criticism as applied to the mini-trial. Finally, Part V offers a conclusion on the propriety of the mini-trial for resolving corporate disputes.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.