This Article examines the related issue of whether a Terry stop initiated for reasonable suspicion that a person is armed inherently authorizes treatment of the detainee as armed and dangerous (and thus authorizes a frisk). As shown in Part III, the U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence is equivocal on the point. Part IV illustrates the conflicting approaches taken by contemporary lower courts. This Article concludes a frisk is not inherently authorized in such a stop, for two separate reasons.
Royce de R. Barondes,
Automatic Authorization of Frisks in Terry Stops for Suspicion of Firearms Possession, 43 Southern Illinois University Law Journal 1
Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs/723