Nothing is Not Enough: Fix the Absurd Post-Booker Federal Sentencing System

Authors

Frank O. Bowman III, University of Missouri School of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2012

Abstract

This article is an elaboration of testimony I gave in February 2012 at a U.S. Sentencing Commission hearing considering whether the advisory guidelines system created by the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in United States v. Booker should be modified or replaced. I argue that it should.

Comments

Published as Frank O. Bowman III., Nothing is Not Enough: Fix the Absurd Post-Booker Federal Sentencing System, 24 Fed.Sent.R. 356 (2012) © 2012 by [the Regents of the University of California/Sponsoring Society or Association]. Copying and permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by [the Regents of the University of California/on behalf of the Sponsoring Society] for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee via Rightslink® on [JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org/r/ucal)] or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com.

Recommended Citation

Frank O. Bowman III., Nothing is Not Enough: Fix the Absurd Post-Booker Federal Sentencing System, 24 Fed.Sent.R. 356 (2012).